Blog navigation page

*These are my PRIVATE, Arcane, Off the record and At heart political views:

Civil Discourse 

   Ideology (Post left/Dark Mutualism)

    Anti Successor Ideology

    EssentialismWokeuralWar

    Political journalists, personalities , parties , factions and groups

  Socioeconomic 

  FinancialCulturalStructural/MonetaryCultural

Social issues

Crime legal law views

Ethnic Racial issues

   Sex related issues and similar issues

     Feminist issues/ Abortion

     Male issues

    Relationships

   Youth disabled issues

  LGBTQ issues and similar issues

   Queer issues/Transgender issues

   Taboo issues

International views

    Innernational views

etc

At heart views

Politicians 

ScienceClimate


After you click on and finish reading each link below and the links within those links, return to this navigation page to click onto your next link or open each link below and links within them in new tabs. 

If you see blue text (like here or below), it means there is a hyperlink in that text so you should click it

 ;-J means tongue and cheek

views I put in italics and put in between Point de doute (Hervé Bazin).svg and ⸮ are irony/post irony views of mine

views I put in italics and have a /s after them are me being sarcastic 

views I put in cormorant upright and that I put in between Point de doute (Hervé Bazin).svg and ⸮ and a /s after them are irony/post irony views of mine plus me being sarcastic 


When I use the term 'base' or 'based' here is what I mean:

The word base means: “Good", "A word used when you agree with something; or when you want to recognize someone for being themselves, i.e. courageous and unique or not caring what others think.”, "being yourself and not caring what others think of you", "Meant to signify that someone or something is the “opposite of cringe"



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dark Mutualism

You can find more about Dark Mutualism here This would use the Landian type of nrx before it went off the rails (in a way that would make Post Anarchists proud) Nothing concrete in terms of true praxis will ever come out of Dark Mutualism This transition from PJ Proudhon and Kevin Carson to classic Karl Marx certainly has yet to be properly articulated and Dark Mutualism tries to do that I know that Edmund Berger is itching to write a book rehabilitating Karl Marx's critique of PJ Proudhon from, um, rehabilitations like that of Iain Mckay which he just finds half-convincing. This shall clarify quite a couple of things about the accelerationism/anarchism relationship, I hope. Many leftists based on their moral convictions would say that Dark Mutualism is the overall understanding of PJ Proudhon’s work and so represents a worthy and essential contribution to the mutualist canon. If that wasn't the case, I wouldn’t give Dark Mutualism much attention just like I already don’t give
Read more

HR in particular

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhRBsJYWR8Q Human rights today have the kind of status that the divine right of kings had in the Middle Ages. 0:05 They are so deeply ingrained in our political thinking, 0:09 that imagining a society without them seems almost impossible. 0:14 We all know the famous line from the Declaration of Independence: 0:17 "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, 0:22 that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights," 0:27 But we should beware of what seems self-evident. 0:29 In many cases, what seems self-evident is less an indication of what is correct or indubitable, 0:36 and more an indication of our biases, an effect of the time and place we live in. 0:41 One of the most influential liberal political philosophers of the 20th century, John Rawls, once even stated that: 0:48 "Human rights are not the consequence of a particular philosophy, 0:52 nor of one way among others of looking at the
Read more