*These are my PRIVATE, Arcane , Off the record and At heart political views: Civil Discourse Ideology ( Post left / Dark Mutualism ) Anti Successor Ideology EssentialismWokeuralWar Political journalists, personalities , parties , factions and groups Socioeconomic FinancialCulturalStructural / MonetaryCultural Social issues Crime legal law views Ethnic Racial issues Sex related issues and similar issues Feminist issues / Abortion Male issues Relationships Youth disabled issues LGBTQ issues and similar issues Queer issues / Transgender issues Taboo issues International views Innernational views etc At heart views Politicians ScienceClimate After you click on and finish reading each link below and the links within those links, return to this navigation page to click onto your next link or open each link below and links within them in new tabs. If you see blue text (like here or below), it means there is a hyperlink in
You can find more about Dark Mutualism here This would use the Landian type of nrx before it went off the rails (in a way that would make Post Anarchists proud) Nothing concrete in terms of true praxis will ever come out of Dark Mutualism This transition from PJ Proudhon and Kevin Carson to classic Karl Marx certainly has yet to be properly articulated and Dark Mutualism tries to do that I know that Edmund Berger is itching to write a book rehabilitating Karl Marx's critique of PJ Proudhon from, um, rehabilitations like that of Iain Mckay which he just finds half-convincing. This shall clarify quite a couple of things about the accelerationism/anarchism relationship, I hope. Many leftists based on their moral convictions would say that Dark Mutualism is the overall understanding of PJ Proudhon’s work and so represents a worthy and essential contribution to the mutualist canon. If that wasn't the case, I wouldn’t give Dark Mutualism much attention just like I already don’t give
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhRBsJYWR8Q Human rights today have the kind of status that the divine right of kings had in the Middle Ages. 0:05 They are so deeply ingrained in our political thinking, 0:09 that imagining a society without them seems almost impossible. 0:14 We all know the famous line from the Declaration of Independence: 0:17 "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, 0:22 that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights," 0:27 But we should beware of what seems self-evident. 0:29 In many cases, what seems self-evident is less an indication of what is correct or indubitable, 0:36 and more an indication of our biases, an effect of the time and place we live in. 0:41 One of the most influential liberal political philosophers of the 20th century, John Rawls, once even stated that: 0:48 "Human rights are not the consequence of a particular philosophy, 0:52 nor of one way among others of looking at the
Comments
Post a Comment