Psdoisdosdios

Good Aspect Xtianity Constructivism is: 

This type of xtianity criticizes the fact that traditional Christianity puts a focus on the passive instead of the active parts of Christ's life, underlining his miraculous birth, the suffering that he endured, the sacrifice he made on the cross for our sins and supernatural redemption. 

Even though this type of xtianity may in theory affirm this type of narrative in not denying them, from an intellectual standpoint, it supplants that type of traditional Christianity with a positive focus on Christ as a dynamic preacher, arranger who was what Max Stirner calls an 'insurrectionary' who radically fought against the Pharisees and Saducees greed, usury, hypocricy, moral piousness and zealotry, jealousness, and more. 

This xtianity presents a Christ who embodies the spirit of the Epistle to the Hebrews

It also shows how Christ was an early adopter of the earliest form of Messianic Judaism

This type of Xtianity breaks with Nicene Christianity because this xtianity has these things below at the core of its value base:

Puts more focus on the New Testament than the Old Testament (like my church did as a kid)

Filters out revisionist, Gnosticist and Judas type changes to the bible or even skips over them

To form fellowship between fellow Christians who show cosmetic attributed traits of a collective of Christian National cultural pre babel ethos tied to Christ and the New Israel (when Christ comes back to set up his kingdom on Earth), passed down from our high priest Melchizedek (while also incorporating some elements of Mormonism into this theory)

Supports a Nordic model type system for this xtianity

Advocates the politicized aim of unity among people by adopting this line of thought:

"However, I believe that the nation is defined as the totality of persons bound together through a common destiny into a community of character. To me, national identity is not necessarily obstructive toward class consciousness, existing as a useful praxis for the self determination of the worker. 

The issues with National identity (within a capitalist society) was not national identify itself but really the tendency of the lower classes to cling to traditions which tether them to the institutions of the old bureaucratic and capitalistic systems in addition to nationality being conceived of exclusive racial/ethnic and territorial means .

I feel that the notions of territorial principle can be substituted in situations where minority populations risked being subjugated by majorities. 

We can use Karl Renner's notion of the "personal principle" as a way of gathering the geographically divided people of the same nation. The personal principle can be used to organize nations not in territorial bodies but in a simple association of persons. (I already support national personal autonomy used in all types of societies)

This would radically disjoin a nation from its territory thus creating a non territorial associated nation. It is important to doing way with sub national territorial identities as undemocratic and allowing for the treatment of non majority populations within each nation that Karl Renner wrote about here. 

Basically, the nation should be conceived as an evolutionary process via open, plural and political construction"

Pushes for unity among Judeao Xtian people to overcome confessional differences between them

Promotes Faith Worshiping/Respecting Society

Pushes back against late stage Traditional Catholicism (Tradcath) 

Supports a eco-Dengist version of future religious commune-states like Israel but for different religions (like a Lutheran commune-state, etc) along with adopting Odinism ideology and Peruvian type of left wing (anti colonial) ultranationalism

Supports Green Libertarian Marxian Unity Municipalist Confederationism

Promotes the connections between Christ and Adam, propping up the fact that Jesus was descended from Adam (who was created perfect) over him being descended from sinners (all people Jesus was descended from after Adam)

Is a form of xtianity Andrew Torba would be ok with (even though he would be banned from all spaces of this ideology since Torba is a fundie wingnut and groyper larper)